For years now, the UGA homopobia study has been one of my favorite pieces of social science, but I’ve never bothered looking it up before. A friend of mine’s dad worked on it, so I first got the rundown from her. Now, I’d like to sum it up for you, and give y’all the citation for the original article in case you want to look it up. I think I’ll do this from time to time, post a review/summary of a study I love or hate.
Long story short, this study looked at homopohbia in men, and asked the question we’ve all been thinking: are homophobic guys secretly into men?
The short answer is yes.
The researchers took a number of men (all white; I assume they didn’t want to bother controlling for cultural differences) who described themselves as fully heterosexual in preference and experience. They had the subjects fill out a questionnaire which asked them how they’d feel if they found out various people around them were gay, if a guy were to hit on them, etc. Using the results of that questionnaire, they chose 2 study group: 35 men who were homophobic, and a control group of 29 who did not have negative emotional responses to homosexuality.
Then, the hooked their volunteers up to a plethysmograph (a loop that fits around the penis and measures changes in its circumfrence, as a proxy for sexual arousal) and showed them porn. Both groups had similar responses to straight porn and lesbian porn, but there was a distinct gap in the way they responded to gay male porn.
The non-homophobic men were pretty bereft of hard-ons, with 66% having ‘insignificant’ arousal. Out of the remaining third, 10% were moderately aroused, and 24% had definite boners.
The homophobic men were much more into it. A mere 20% of them had insignificant changes in their penis metrics, while 26% were moderately aroused and a whopping 54% were definitely turned on. That’s some serious statistical significance.
What’s better, when the participants were asked later which videos had aroused them, all participants gave answers that matched the peter-meter measurements, with one major exception: the homophobic men consistently underestimated their response to the gay porn. Either they were lying, or they were in enough denial to not notice they were turned on despite having their pants around their ankles and a bonerometer on their dicks. You be the judge.
Now, before the gloating goes too far, there’s a couple of points I want to cover. It’s possible, though less likely, that the homophobic guys got hard-ons because the gay porn made them nervous, or because a bunch of them were exhibitionists. Also, the study tells us noting about homophobic women. And lastly, I’d be interested in seeing a breakdown by religion–I want to know if people who are told by their clergy that gay folks are going to hell really internalize that message all the way to their crotches.
Anyway, I couldn’t find the article anywhere on the open web, so I’ll just give you the citation:
Henry Adams, Lester Wright Jr. & Bethany Lohr. “Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105 (1996), P. 440-445
Next time you find yourself arguing with a homophobe, you’ll have a handy trump card.
You can thanks me later.
That’s one of my favorites. :D
Comment by kc — May 8, 2008 @ 10:53 pm
This reminded me of American Beauty, which made the same point artistically. I continue to be baffled by how people can be so afraid of each other for truly benign things… Sigh.
Comment by Kelsey Jarboe — May 11, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
[...] Cocktail Party Bibliography: The Homophobia Study From An Inordinate Fondness for Beetles: a fascinating study on male homophobics’ sexual response to gay porn. (tags: queer gay_and_lesbian homophobia sexuality) [...]
Pingback by links for 2008-05-12 « don’t ya wish your girlfriend was smart like me? — July 28, 2008 @ 9:26 pm
mm… bookmarked :)
Comment by Uncoopy — April 11, 2009 @ 2:47 pm